{"id":4511,"date":"2011-12-28T21:43:09","date_gmt":"2011-12-29T04:43:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/?p=4511"},"modified":"2011-12-28T21:43:09","modified_gmt":"2011-12-29T04:43:09","slug":"twitter-ignored-request-to-keep-subpoena-under-wraps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/?p=4511","title":{"rendered":"Twitter Ignored Request To Keep Subpoena Under Wraps"},"content":{"rendered":"

Twitter Ignored Request To Keep Subpoena Under Wraps<\/strong>
\nDecember 28 2011 – by: Admin – InfoShop<\/p>\n

Twitter appears to have forwarded a subpoena requesting user information to at least one of the owners of the accounts in question, despite a request from the Suffolk Massachusetts District Attorney’s office that the request not be disclosed “to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the ongoing criminal action” regarding the hackitivist group Anonymous and events surrounding the Occupy Boston protest.
\nTwitter Ignored Request To Keep Subpoena Under Wraps<\/p>\n

By Dave Copeland
\nReadWriteWeb
\nDecember 27, 2011<\/p>\n

Twitter appears to have forwarded a subpoena requesting user information to at least one of the owners of the accounts in question, despite a request from the Suffolk Massachusetts District Attorney’s office that the request not be disclosed “to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the ongoing criminal action” regarding the hackitivist group Anonymous and events surrounding the Occupy Boston protest.<\/p>\n

“Haha. Boston PD submitted to Twitter for my information. Lololol? For what? Posting info pulled from public domains? #comeatmebro,” said the owner of the Twitter handle @p0isAn0N last week, in a post that included the subpoena. The subpoena also sought user information, including IP addresses for @OccupBoston, Guido Fawkes (there are more than 30 accounts using the name Guido Fawkes on Twitter) and subscriber information for the hash tage #BostonPD. …source<\/a><\/p>\n

Tweet<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Twitter Ignored Request To Keep Subpoena Under Wraps December 28 2011 – by: Admin – InfoShop Twitter appears to have forwarded a subpoena requesting user information to at least one of the owners of the accounts in question, despite a request from the Suffolk Massachusetts District Attorney’s office that the request not be disclosed “to more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[247],"tags":[1269],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4511"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4511"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4511\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4512,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4511\/revisions\/4512"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}