{"id":4115,"date":"2011-12-05T14:57:13","date_gmt":"2011-12-05T21:57:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/?p=4115"},"modified":"2011-12-05T14:57:13","modified_gmt":"2011-12-05T21:57:13","slug":"recent-gassing-of-protesters-leaves-questions-about-origin-and-toxicity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/?p=4115","title":{"rendered":"Recent Gassing of Protesters leaves questions about origin and toxicity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The liberal use of US-manufactured tear gas on protesters<\/strong><br \/>\n24-11-2011 &#8211; moqawama &#8211; By Ahmed Feteha, Michael Gunn<\/p>\n<p>The liberal use of US-manufactured tear gas on protesters in recent days has raised questions about its public health effects &#8211; and who is actually ordering its use.<\/p>\n<p>Egyptian security forces are digging deeper into their budget with each volley of increasingly fatal US-made tear gas they launch at demonstrators.<br \/>\nThe human cost of the violent crackdown in central Cairo is increasingly clear &#8212; among the 39 fatalities reported to date, several are said to have died of asphyxiation caused by tear gas.<br \/>\nBut the financial background to the use of crowd control weapons raises questions about the extent of Washington&#8217;s financial assistance to Egypt&#8217;s military and how this might filter down to the ministry of interior.<\/p>\n<p>The USA is the biggest arms supplier to Egypt, providing an average of US$1.3 billion in military and law equipment every year since 2000.<br \/>\nRecords from the US Department of State show the US supplied $1.7 million of &#8220;toxicological agents&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;including tear gases and riot control agents&#8221; &#8212; to Egypt in 2010.<\/p>\n<p>This was the largest dispatch of such agents in at least 10 years.<br \/>\nIn 2009, the US supplied 33,000 units of &#8216;tear gas and riot control agents&#8217; worth $460,000. It did not supply in 2007 nor 2008, but gave 17,000 units worth $240,000 in 2006, documents show.<\/p>\n<p>This assistance, however, was granted to the military, and it is not clear whether it was then channelled to the ministry of interior.<br \/>\nThe Central Security Forces (CSF), Egypt&#8217;s riot control machine, is a division within the Ministry of Interior, but is closely tied to the armed forces, as its troops are conscripted through the military then transferred to CSF.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The military&#8217;s arming includes tear gas and riot control weapons. The ministry of interior supposedly buys its own weaponry through other channels,&#8221; Mahmoud Kotri, a retired brigadier general who wrote a book suggesting radical police reforms, told Ahram Online.<\/p>\n<p>Kotri confirmed that when the current minister of interior, Mansour El-Essawy, was appointed in March he issued explicit instructions to CSF not to carry live ammunition when confronting protesters.<\/p>\n<p>This directive apparently included a ban on shotguns. Kotra explained these weapons were formerly used to fire tear gas canisters via an ad-hoc launcher. El-Essawy&#8217;s instructions probably forced CSF to acquire new types of gas bombs and new ways of launching them, says Kotri.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, doctors on Tahrir Square treating the injured say they have seen many protesters hit by live ammunition, including shotgun wounds.<br \/>\nKotri believes that a third party might be involved in the shootings<br \/>\n&#8220;No MOI official in his right mind would order the use of live ammunition. Not after what happened in January and the former security leadership currently on trial for killing protesters &#8212; it just doesn&#8217;t add up,&#8221; he says.<br \/>\nProtesters and medical staff in Cairo have also expressed concern about the kind of gas being deployed by security forces.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking to Ahram Online at the field hospital in Qasr El-Dobara church behind Tahrir Square on Monday night, volunteer doctor Lilian Sobhy said their improvised clinic had seen 290 patients in 24 hours, the majority with breathing problems.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Some in contact with the gas are suffering from a severe burning sensation in the lungs,&#8221; Sobhy said. &#8220;This is not normal gas and these are not normal symptoms.&#8221;<br \/>\nOthers, however, claim the symptoms &#8212; serious though they are &#8212; are no different from those caused by extreme exposure to CS gas in the past.<br \/>\nA former police officer told Ahram Online a colleague of his in the CSF was exposed to tear gas used by Egyptian border guards on Palestinians who broke through Rafah crossing in 2008.<\/p>\n<p>He said the army&#8217;s gas was &#8220;unbearable and different from that used by CSF&#8221;.<br \/>\nGiven the impressions above, many questions arise.<br \/>\nIs this a new kind of gas? If so, what is its nature? Is it designed use on civilians or is it a much more powerful assault tool used for military purposes? Who provided such weapons to the CSF? Was it the army, or did it get them through other channels?<a href=\"http:\/\/www.english.moqawama.org\/essaydetails.php?eid=15973&#038;cid=274\"> &#8230;more<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"igit_tsb_button\" style=\"float: left; margin-right: 10px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.crookedbough.com%2F%3Fp%3D4115&amp;text=Recent+Gassing+of+Protesters+leaves+questions+about+origin+and+toxicity&amp;count=horizontal&amp;via=\" style=\"\" class=\"twitter-share-button\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The liberal use of US-manufactured tear gas on protesters 24-11-2011 &#8211; moqawama &#8211; By Ahmed Feteha, Michael Gunn The liberal use of US-manufactured tear gas on protesters in recent days has raised questions about its public health effects &#8211; and who is actually ordering its use. Egyptian security forces are digging deeper into their budget <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/?p=4115#more-'\" class=\"more-link\">more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[247],"tags":[2144],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4115"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4115\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}