Bahrain and Human Rights
\nBy Anthony Newkirk, July 22, 2011<\/p>\n
It is becoming painfully obvious that the United States is hostile to the \u201cArab Spring.\u201d In Egypt, U.S. military aid programs remain in force, and in Yemen a \u201csecret\u201d U.S. war may be in the offing. In the United Arab Emirates plans may be afoot to develop a for-profit rapid reaction force (to crackdown, surely, on UAE citizens for \u201cpublicly insulting\u201d their leader). The U.S. government continues to support the Israeli blockade of Gaza. But perhaps the quintessential example of U.S. reactionary policy is in the tiny Kingdom of Bahrain.<\/p>\n
July 1 marked the beginning of a \u201cNational Dialogue\u201d in Bahrain that King Hamad Isa bin Al Khalifa called to promote reconciliation in his strife-torn land. But it is unclear what the point of the National Dialogue is when the king is also attempting to silence Bahraini civil society. The country\u2019s ongoing domestic conflict between an unpopular Sunni elite and a Shia majority came to a boil in February when mostly Shia Bahrainis began protesting against long-standing discrimination. The ruling family offers the pretext that over half of the country\u2019s 500,000 citizens are under the thrall of Shia Iran. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been proclaiming that the United States will stand up for human rights in Bahrain and also ensure its status as a \u201cmajor non-NATO ally.\u201d
\nSend in the Marines<\/p>\n
On March 16, one month after the demonstrations began, King Hamad imposed martial law and police attacked Pearl Roundabout, where most of the protesters were camped out. Two days earlier, at least 1,000 Saudi troops and 500 UAE police attached to the Peninsula Shield Force (PSF) entered Bahrain. Although part of the occupation force may have already left Bahrain after the official end of martial law last month, the PSF presence in Bahrain may last long-term in order to \u201cprotect its borders.\u201d <\/p>\n
A report recently issued by Human Rights Watch (HRW) details ongoing human rights violations, including torture, disappearances, and a systemic crackdown on the majority Shia. Such matters should be of grave concern to the State Department\u2019s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, which officially plays a key role in formulating U.S. human rights policy.<\/p>\n
But the Obama administration sees the situation quite differently, regardless of Secretary of State Clinton’s statements about human rights and administration declarations about \u201cthe rule of law.\u201d In this case, actions are a much more dependable guide to U.S. policy. On March 1, Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps General James F. Amos informed the House Armed Services Committee that a Marine Expeditionary Brigade headquarters for operations in the Middle East and Africa had already been established in Bahrain. Both former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen visited Bahrain amid the protests. Bahrain, of course, hosts the U.S. Fifth Fleet and is the naval headquarters of U.S. Central Command.<\/p>\n
The administration’s actions suggest that it is closer to the perspective of such private sector representatives as S. Rob Sobhani, president of Caspian Energy Consulting. Sobhani, a member of the right-wing Committee on the Present Danger reconstituted in 2004, has characterized King Hamad as a \u201cthoughtful and progressive leader\u201d committed to \u201ceconomic growth\u201d and \u201cstability.\u201d …more<\/a><\/p>\n