{"id":11016,"date":"2012-07-20T13:30:02","date_gmt":"2012-07-20T20:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/?p=11016"},"modified":"2012-07-20T13:30:02","modified_gmt":"2012-07-20T20:30:02","slug":"u-s-nixed-iranian-offer-ensuring-no-nuclear-weapon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/?p=11016","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Nixed Iranian Offer Ensuring No Nuclear Weapon"},"content":{"rendered":"

U.S. Rejected 2005 Iranian Offer Ensuring No Nuclear Weapons<\/strong>
\nBy Gareth Porter – 7 June, 2012 <\/p>\n

WASHINGTON, Jun 7 2012 (IPS) – France and Germany were prepared in spring 2005 to negotiate on an Iranian proposal to convert all of its enriched uranium to fuel rods, making it impossible to use it for nuclear weapons, but Britain vetoed the deal at the insistence of the United States, according to a new account by a former top Iranian nuclear negotiator.<\/p>\n

Seyed Hossein Mousavian, who had led Iran\u2019s nuclear negotiating team in 2004 and 2005, makes it clear that the reason that offer was rejected was that the George W. Bush administration refused to countenance any Iranian enrichment capability, regardless of the circumtances.<\/p>\n

Mousavian reveals previously unknown details about that pivotal episode in the diplomacy surrounding the Iran nuclear issue in memoirs published Tuesday.<\/p>\n

Mousavian, now a visiting research scholar at Princeton University\u2019s Woodrow Wilson School, had been a top political aide to former president Hashemi Rafsanjani and head of the foreign relations committee of Iran\u2019s Supreme National Security Council during his political-diplomatic career in Iran.<\/p>\n

Mousavian had been entrusted with Iran\u2019s most sensitive diplomatic missions, including negotiations on a strategic understanding with Saudi crown prince Abdullah in the early 1990s and with U.S. officials on Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda in 2001 and 2002, his memoirs reveal. But he was arrested by the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad administration on charges of \u201cespionage\u201d in April 2007.<\/p>\n

The British and U.S. refusal to pursue the Iranian offer, which might have headed off the political diplomatic crisis over the Iranian nuclear programme since then, is confirmed by a former British diplomat who participated in the talks and former European ambassadors to Iran.<\/p>\n

Mousavian writes that one of the European negotiators told him that \u201cthey were ready to compromise but that the United States was the obstacle.\u201d<\/p>\n

The episode occurred a few months after an agreement between Iran and the British, French and German governments on Nov. 15, 2004 on terms for negotiations on \u201clong-term arrangements\u201d, during which Iran agreed to maintain a voluntary suspension of enrichment and other nuclear activities.<\/p>\n

The agreement to be negotiated was to \u201cprovide objective guarantees that Iran\u2019s nuclear programme is exclusively for peaceful purposes\u201d as well as \u201cfirm guarantees on nuclear, technological and economic cooperation and firm commitments on security issues\u201d.<\/p>\n

But the EU objective in the talks was to demand a complete end to all Iranian enrichment. At the Mar. 23, 2005 meeting in Paris, the EU called for an indefinite suspension of enrichment by Iran, meaning suspension beyond the negotiations themselves. …more<\/a><\/p>\n

Tweet<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

U.S. Rejected 2005 Iranian Offer Ensuring No Nuclear Weapons By Gareth Porter – 7 June, 2012 WASHINGTON, Jun 7 2012 (IPS) – France and Germany were prepared in spring 2005 to negotiate on an Iranian proposal to convert all of its enriched uranium to fuel rods, making it impossible to use it for nuclear weapons, more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[247],"tags":[2114],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11016"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11016"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11016\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11018,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11016\/revisions\/11018"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11016"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11016"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11016"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}