{"id":10629,"date":"2012-07-05T09:19:10","date_gmt":"2012-07-05T16:19:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/?p=10629"},"modified":"2012-07-05T09:19:10","modified_gmt":"2012-07-05T16:19:10","slug":"terrorism-isnt-the-disease-egregious-injustice-is","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/?p=10629","title":{"rendered":"“Terrorism” Isn\u2019t The Disease; Egregious Injustice Is"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u2018Terrorism Isn\u2019t The Disease; Egregious Injustice Is\u2019<\/strong>
\nPANINI ANAND interviews ARUNDHATI ROY – Frontlines of Revolutionary Struggle<\/p>\n

No one individual critic has taken on the Indian State like Arundhati Roy has. In a fight that began with Pokhran, moved to Narmada, and over the years extended to other insurgencies, people\u2019s struggles and the Maoist underground, she has used her pensmanship to challenge India\u2019s government, its elite, corporate giants, and most recently, the entire structure of global finance and capitalism. She was jailed for a day in 2002 for contempt of court, and slapped with sedition charges in November 2010 for an alleged anti-India speech she delivered, along with others, at a seminar in New Delhi on Kashmir, titled \u2018Azadi\u2014the only way\u2019. Excerpts from an interview to Panini Anand:<\/p>\n

How do you look at laws like sedition and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, or those like AFSPA, in what is touted as the largest democracy?<\/strong><\/p>\n

I\u2019m glad you used the word touted. It\u2019s a good word to use in connection with India\u2019s democracy. It certainly is a democracy for the middle class. In places like Kashmir or Manipur or Chhattisgarh, democracy is not available. Not even in the black market. Laws like the UAPA, which is just the UPA government\u2019s version of POTA, and the AFSPA are ridiculously authoritarian\u2014they allow the State to detain and even kill people with complete impunity. They simply ought to have no place in a democracy. But as long as they don\u2019t affect the mainstream middle class, as long as they are used against people in Manipur, Nagaland or Kashmir, or against the poor or against Muslim \u2018terrorists\u2019 in the \u2018mainland\u2019, nobody seems to mind very much.<\/p>\n

\u201cIndia\u2019s democracy is for the middle class; for Kashmir or Manipur, it\u2019s not available. Not even in the black market.\u201d \t<\/p>\n

Are the people waging war against the State or is the State waging war against its people? How do you look at the Emergency of the \u201970s, or the minorities who feel targeted, earlier the Sikhs and now the Muslims?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Some people are waging war against the State. The State is waging a war against a majority of its citizens. The Emergency in the \u201970s became a problem because Indira Gandhi\u2019s government was foolish enough to target the middle class, foolish enough to lump them with the lower classes and the disenfranchised. Vast parts of the country today are in a much more severe Emergency-like situation. But this contemporary Emergency has gone into the workshop for denting-painting. It\u2019s come out smarter, more streamlined. I\u2019ve said this before: look at the wars the Indian government has waged since India became a sovereign nation; look at the instances when the army has been called out against its \u2018own\u2019 people\u2014Nagaland, Assam, Mizoram, Manipur, Kashmir, Telangana, Goa, Bengal, Punjab and (soon to come) Chhattisgarh\u2014it is a State that is constantly at war. And always against minorities\u2014tribal people, Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, never against the middle class, upper-caste Hindus.
\n
\nHow does one curb the cycle of violence if the State takes no action against ultra-left \u2018terrorist groups\u2019? Wouldn\u2019t it jeopardise internal security?<\/strong><\/p>\n

I don\u2019t think anybody is advocating that no action should be taken against terrorist groups, not even the \u2018terrorists\u2019 themselves. They are not asking for anti-terror laws to be done away with. They are doing what they do, knowing full well what the consequences will be, legally or otherwise. They are expressing fury and fighting for a change in a system that manufactures injustice and inequality. They don\u2019t see themselves as \u2018terrorists\u2019. When you say \u2018terrorists\u2019 if you are referring to the CPI (Maoist), though I do not subscribe to Maoist ideology, I certainly do not see them as terrorists. Yes they are militant, they are outlaws. But then anybody who resists the corporate-state juggernaut is now labelled a Maoist\u2014whether or not they belong to or even agree with the Maoist ideology. People like Seema Azad are being sentenced to life imprisonment for possessing banned literature. <\/p>\n


\nSo what is the definition of \u2018terrorist\u2019 now, in 2012? <\/strong> It is actually the economic policies that are causing this massive inequality, this hunger, this displacement that is jeopardising internal security\u2014not the people who are protesting against them. Do we want to address the symptoms or the disease? The disease is not terrorism. It\u2019s egregious injustice. Sure, even if we were a reasonably just society, Maoists would still exist. So would other extremist groups who believe in armed resistance or in terrorist attacks. But they would not have the support they have today. As a country, we should be ashamed of ourselves for tolerating this squalor, this misery and the overt as well as covert ethnic and religious bigotry we see all around us. (Narendra Modi for Prime Minister!! Who in their right mind can even imagine that?) We have stopped even pretending that we have a sense of justice. All we\u2019re doing is genuflecting to major corporations and to that sinking ocean-liner known as the United States of America. …more<\/a><\/p>\n

Tweet<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u2018Terrorism Isn\u2019t The Disease; Egregious Injustice Is\u2019 PANINI ANAND interviews ARUNDHATI ROY – Frontlines of Revolutionary Struggle No one individual critic has taken on the Indian State like Arundhati Roy has. In a fight that began with Pokhran, moved to Narmada, and over the years extended to other insurgencies, people\u2019s struggles and the Maoist underground, more \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[247],"tags":[3160],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10629"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10629"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10629\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10630,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10629\/revisions\/10630"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crookedbough.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}